Problem #2241
Propose and define Access Groups naming conventions
| Status: | Resolved | Start date: | 07/24/2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Piotr Pająk | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - |
Description
These is the initial proposal:
- Use full words and avoid abbreviations.
- Only allowed abbreviations are SL, IN, DK, PL
- By default department names will be used for the group containing all the department employees
- Only “+” is allowed as a special character
-
History
#1 Updated by Malith Batugedara 11 months ago
Suggest Examples : Information Technology SL
Human Resource PL + DK
Research and Development ALL
#2 Updated by Malith Batugedara 11 months ago
Malith Batugedara wrote:
Information Technology SLSuggested examples :
Human Resource PL + DK
Research and Development ALL
#3 Updated by Malith Batugedara 10 months ago
If we change accessibility scope to access group all the flows related to accessibility scope should be change(have to put access group in every location)
#4 Updated by Malith Batugedara 10 months ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
#5 Updated by Malith Batugedara 10 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
#6 Updated by Malith Batugedara 10 months ago
The new naming conventions for access groups should be updated in the Elsteel library.